Connell D. Hawkins v. Officer Kinlaw; Officer Strickland; Officer Russell; Officer Bullard; Officer J. Prince

15-6976Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 ott 2015

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6976
CONNELL D. HAWKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER KINLAW; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER RUSSELL;
OFFICER BULLARD; OFFICER J. PRINCE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03241-F)
Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 23, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Connell D. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015)
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.