Chun Rao, a/k/a Rao Chun v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

15-1292Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18 ago 2015

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1292
CHUN RAO, a/k/a Rao Chun,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: August 12, 2015 Decided: August 18, 2015
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chun Rao, Petitioner Pro Se. Charles S. Greene, III, Erik
Robert Quick, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Chun Rao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of
China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Rao fails in
his informal brief to challenge several key findings in the
Board’s order that are ultimately dispositive of his claims, we
conclude that Rao has forfeited appellate review of these
findings and deny the petition for review. See In re Chun Rao
(BIA Feb. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.