Darlene J. Davis v. Comcast Corporation, Inc.; Joe Minor; Dan Simson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1143
DARLENE J. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, INC.; JOE MINOR; DAN SIMSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DANA THOMAS; RICO WADE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01513-GBL-IDD)
Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: August 5, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darlene J. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy McCormack, Michelle
Marie McGeogh, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland,
Constantinos George Panagopoulos, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Darlene J. Davis appeals various pretrial orders and the
district court’s final order denying relief on her complaint
filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Equal Pay Act, 29
U.S.C. § 206(d) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Davis v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:13-cv-
01513-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2015). Davis has filed a
motion for a hearing in this Court, stating that she did not
receive one of Comcast’s attachments to its response. Because
Comcast has now filed the requested attachment, we deny Davis’
motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --