Andrew Taylor; Naomi Taylor v. Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr.

14-2043Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 giu 2015

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2043
ANDREW TAYLOR; NAOMI TAYLOR,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
RONALD JEFFERSON DAVIS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-02717-RMG)
Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Jefferson Davis, Appellant Pro Se. W. Andrew Gowder,
Jr., PRATT-THOMAS WALKER, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM:
Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr., appeals from the district
court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation and upholding the bankruptcy court’s
determination that the debt he owes to Andrew and Naomi Taylor
is non-dischargeable in his bankruptcy case. On appeal, Davis
argues only that the Taylors failed to timely file the
certificate of service for the amended complaint and that the
bankruptcy court erred by denying his motion to strike the
amended complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration of
that order. We grant the Taylors’ motion to supplement the
record. Upon review of the record, as supplemented, we find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Taylor v. Davis, No. 2:13-cv-02717-
RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.