Dawn V. Martin; Miguel Gallardo v. Johannes Brondum

14-1644Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10 ago 2016

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1644
DAWN V. MARTIN; MIGUEL GALLARDO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JOHANNES BRONDUM; LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC.; LONG AND
FOSTER COMPANIES; LONG AND FOSTER REALTORS; PATRICIA KNIGHT,
a/k/a Patricia Knight Lambert; SUSAN HAUGHTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-01118-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: July 29, 2016 Decided: August 10, 2016
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dawn V. Martin, LAW OFFICES OF DAWN V. MARTIN, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellants. Susan F. Earman, FRIEDLANDER, FRIEDLANDER &
EARMAN, PC, McLean, Virginia; Mikhael D. Charnoff, PERRY CHARNOFF
PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dawn V. Martin and Miguel Gallardo appeal the district court’s
order denying their Fed. R. Civ. Rule 60(b) motion challenging the
taxation of costs and denying their request to submit color
photographs by electronic means. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Martin v. Brondum, No. 1:11-cv-
01118-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.