Vicki A. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership

14-1372Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 ago 2014

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1372
VICKI A. LINDSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.;
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.; WESTERN INDUSTRIES-SOUTH, LLC;
JOHN DOE #1,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN)
Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicki A. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Janeen Beth Koch, KALBAUGH,
PFUND & MESSERSMITH, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Alison Wright
Feehan, KUTAK ROCK, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Daniel Jay Gerber,
RUMBERGER KIRK & CALDWELL, Orlando, Florida, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s
orders denying her fifth motion to set aside the judgment, her
motion to recuse the district court judge, and her motion for
reconsideration. By these motions, Lindsey sought to challenge
the district court’s February 2012 order granting summary
judgment for the Defendants in her action alleging premises
liability and negligent application of a banned substance. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-
00447-HEH-DJN (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2014 & Apr. 17, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.