James Robinson v. KAREN FRYAR, Solicitor

13-6992Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 set 2013

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6992
JAMES ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAREN FRYAR, Solicitor; VANESSA COOPER, Solicitor; WARREN
GIESE, Solicitor; JOHN BREEDEN, JR., Judge; INVESTIGATOR G.
BURNS, CPD; DONNA STROM, Judge Family Court,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:12-cv-03505-JFA)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James Robinson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Robinson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint and a subsequent order denying Robinson’s motion to
amend and/or for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Fryar, No.
3:12-cv-03505-JFA (D.S.C. filed Apr. 9, 2013 & entered Apr. 10,
2013; June 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.