United States of America v. Jessie Lamont Bagley, a/k/a Tug

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6801
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JESSIE LAMONT BAGLEY, a/k/a Tug,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:06-cr-00135-BO-1)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie Lamont Bagley, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jessie Lamont Bagley appeals the district court’s
order denying Bagley’s motion for a sentence reduction pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2102). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.*
United States v. Bagley, No. 5:06-cr-00135-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed
May 2, 2013; entered May 3, 2013); see also 4th Cir. R. 34(b)
(limiting appellate review to issues raised in informal brief).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* While Bagley’s informal brief challenges his career
offender designation under United States v. Davis, 720 F.3d 215
(4th Cir. 2013), this argument was not raised in the district
court and is not properly before us. See Muth v. United States,
1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (stating that arguments raised
for first time on appeal generally will not be considered).

-- 2 of 2 --