Thomas Francis Stack, Jr. v. Outstanding Marine

13-2471Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 mar 2014

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2471
THOMAS FRANCIS STACK, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OUTSTANDING MARINE; JAMES E. STACK; COLONEL GEORGE JOHNSON,
MD/DNR; OFFICER R. KAUFMAN; OFFICER PHILLIPS; JOHN GRIFFIN,
Maryland Department of Natural Resources; BRENDA DONALD,
Maryland Human Resources Agency; SKIP BOLINGER; CARL
SNOWDEN, Civil Rights Director; STEVEN P. LEMMEY; GIANT
FOOD; RICHARD BAKER; TERRY KOKOLIS; JOHN E. GUNNING; EDWARD
A. HOLDEN; Harbormaster J. P. WALTERS; BRUCE LALONDE,
Director, Oasis Opportunity Center; OFFICER GARVEY; MARY
STACK DIXON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
(Police),
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01835-WMN)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Francis Stack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Francis Stack, Jr., appeals the district
court’s orders dismissing his civil complaints and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Stack v. Outstanding Marine, No. 1:13-
cv-01835-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 7, 2013). We deny Stack’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.