In re: Louis Antonio Bryant, a/k/a Tinio, a/k/a Black, a/k/a B Stacks

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2405
In re: LOUIS ANTONIO BRYANT, a/k/a Tinio, a/k/a Black,
a/k/a B Stacks,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:04-cr-00047-NKM-RSB-1; 3:10-cv-80256-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis Antonio Bryant, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Louis Antonio Bryant petitions for a writ of mandamus
seeking an order from this Court directing the district court to
conduct a thorough analysis of his claims. We conclude that
Bryant is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used
only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States
Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further,
mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a
clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).
Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal.
In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
Accordingly, the relief sought by Bryant is not available by way
of mandamus. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --