Tanya Lynn Cetina v. Michelin North America

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1864
TANYA LYNN CETINA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA; NEWBOLD SERVICES; CLINT MORGAN; DAVE
MURPHY; DAVE BROWN; DAVE MAUGER,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SANDRA CHAVEZ,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(6:12-cv-02222-TMC-JDA)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tanya Lynn Cetina, Appellant Pro Se. Collie William Lehn, Jr.,
Fred W. Suggs, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Sima Bhakta Patel, Thomas Louis

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Stephenson, NEXSEN PRUET, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Tanya Lynn Cetina seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss
her claims against Defendants Dave Mauger and Michelin North
America, Incorporated. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because Cetina’s claims against
several other Defendants remain, the orders Cetina seeks to
appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or
collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --