Audrey Scott v. Tiaa-Cref

13-1829Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21 ott 2013

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1829
AUDREY SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIAA-CREF,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Audrey Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Felicia A. Washington, K&L
GATES LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Audrey Scott appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint alleging discrimination and
retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Scott v. TIAA-CREF, No. 3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK
(W.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.