William Clayton McKinnedy, Iii v. MS. BRENDA KEE-LIPPE, 041334 Officer

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6950
WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. BRENDA KEE-LIPPE, 041334 Officer; SERGEANT CLARK, A-2
Shift; LIEUTENANT G. MACKEY; CAPTAIN SMITH; C. JOHNSON; R.
MILLER; T. SMITH; THOMPSON; M. JONES; FORD; D. SEWARD; J.
WASHINGTON; J. MCKAYE; C. REYNOLDS; J. ARMSTRONG; A.
SELLARS; P. HOUGH; A. HARDIN; M. COLEMAN; G. POTOKA; O.
SHAHEED; ROBERT WARD; D. PATTERSON; C. LONG; SCARBOROUGH; N.
HUGHES, JR.; E. ROWE; C. CANNON; S. WILLIS; B. BAKER; H.
MCMASTER; J. OZMINT; ROLLINGS; T. MUTAKABBIR; J. SLIGH, JR.;
R. PITTMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:10-cv-02298-HMH)
Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 2, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Clayton McKinnedy, III, Appellant Pro Se. Steven
Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON,
Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
William Clayton McKinnedy, III, appeals the district
court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
McKinnedy v. Kee-Lippe, No. 6:10-cv-02298-HMH (D.S.C. Mar 13,
2012 & Apr. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --