Michael A. Williams v. Marshal Griffin

12-6384Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 giu 2012

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6384
MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARSHAL GRIFFIN; OFFICER FOX; OFFICER GRAY; OFFICER
ALPERSTEIN; OFFICER ANDERSON; OFFICER CLARK; JOSEPH M.
LIGHTSEY; MADONNA GODWIN, Nurse; STEVE DOLINSKI, Head
Director of Nursing,
Defendants – Appellees,
JOSEPH M. LIGHTSEY; MADONNA GODWIN, Nurse; STEVE DOLINSKI,
Head Director of Nursing,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:10-ct-03122-FL)
Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Antwon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F.
Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina;
Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth Street, YOUNG, MOORE

-- 1 of 3 --

2
& HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Williams v. Griffin, No. 5:10-ct-03122-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb.
22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.