Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1876
ROBIN J. VINESETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00415-MOC-DCK)
Submitted: April 29, 2013 Decided: June 6, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kirk J. Angel, THE ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Charles A. Gartland, II, Leslie W.
Bradenham, Susan B. Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robin J. Vinesett appeals from the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of United Parcel
Service on his employment discrimination case. We have reviewed
the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Vinesett v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.,
No. 3:10-cv-00415-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
