Darius Dywane Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman

12-1150Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 apr 2012

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1150
DARIUS DYWANE MITCHELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
VALUE OPTIONS; RIVERSIDE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:11-cv-00118-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darius Dywane Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Edward Warmbier,
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Darius Mitchell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman, No. 4:11-cv-00118-RAJ-DEM
(E.D. Va. Jan. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.