Randolph A. Watterson v. DUANE TERRELL, Assistant Superintendent at Marion Corr. Inst.

11-7373Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 feb 2012

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7373
RANDOLPH A. WATTERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WILLIE C. GLASCOE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DUANE TERRELL, Assistant Superintendent at Marion Corr.
Inst.; MARCELLA FAIRCLOTH, Lieutenant at Marion Corr. Inst.;
CAPTAIN COPENING, at Marion Corr. Inst.; VIRGINIA
BROOKSHIRE, Mailroom Worker at Marion Corr. Inst.; NEWTON,
Assistant Unit Manager at Marion Prison; J. WASHBURN, Sgt at
Marion Prison,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DERRICK E. FOX, Officer; BOONE, Officer,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cv-00184-RJC)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randolph A. Watterson, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Randolph A. Watterson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Watterson v. Terrell, No. 1:10-cv-00184-RJC (W.D.N.C.
Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.