Thomas K. Hogge v. HARVARD STEPHENS, Dr., Chief Physician, Office of Health Services, sued individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7340
THOMAS K. HOGGE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HARVARD STEPHENS, Dr., Chief Physician, Office of Health
Services, sued individually and in official capacity;
MANICKAVASAGER, Dr., Institutional Physician, Deerfield
Correctional Center, sued individually and in official
capacity; ALVIN HARRIS, Dr., Chief Institutional Physician
(Past), Deerfield Correctional Center, sued individually
and in official capacity; LINDA ROBB, Phlebotomist (Lab
Technician), Powhatan Medical Unit (Receiving), sued
individually and in official capacity; FRED SCHILLINGS,
Director of Prison Health Services, sued individually and
in official capacity,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
KEITH DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued
individually and in official capacity; BENITA BADGETTE,
Healthcare Adm., Deerfield Correctional Center, sued
individually and in official capacity; HOFFMAN, Dr.,
Institutional Physician, Deerfield Correctional Center,
sued individually and in official capacity; AMONETTE, Dr.,
Chief Institutional Physician, Powhatan Receiving Unit,
sued individually and in official capacity; MARY JOHNSON,
Registered Nurse, Deerfield Correctional Center, sued
individually and in official capacity; FRED SCHILLING,
Defendants.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00582-JRS)
Submitted: February 29, 2012 Decided: March 13, 2012
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas K. Hogge, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier,
TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Kevin Hogge appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hogge v. Stephens, No. 3:09-cv-00582-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept.
24, 2010; June 1, Sept. 6 & 16, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --