DAUGHTON W. LACEY, JR., a/k/a Baruch Yah Hawkins v. DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden

11-7173Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit3 feb 2012

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7173
DAUGHTON W. LACEY, JR., a/k/a Baruch Yah Hawkins,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden; STEVE HOLLAR, Assistant Warden;
TRACY LAWHORN, Treatment Program Supervisor; LIEUTENANT
PERRY; SERGEANT STICKLER, C/O; WORKMAN, C/O; GRIFFIN, C/O;
JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director
of Operations; LIEUTENANT CANTERBURY; PHYLLIS BYRD, Law
Library Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00139-JLK)
Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson
Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion. See Cienna Corp. v. Jarrard, 203
F.3d 312, 322 (4th Cir. 2000) (providing review standard).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lacey v. Braxton, No. 7:10-cv-00139-JLK (W.D. Va. Aug.
1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.