Jonathan Ojeda v. Dr. Procter, sued individually

11-6801Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit7 ott 2011

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6801
JONATHAN OJEDA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. PROCTER, sued individually and as an Agent of Wexford
Medical Sources; TRISTEN TENNY, sued individually and as
Agent of Wexford Medical Resources; ADRIAN HOKE, sued
individually and in his Official Capacity; WEXFORD MEDICAL
SOURCES, sued as a Corporation, working within the State of
West Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00126-JPB-DJJ)
Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: October 7, 2011
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Ojeda, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Cameron Petty, ROSE
PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellees
Procter and Tenny.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Ojeda appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ojeda v. Procter, No. 2:10-cv-00126-JPB-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. June
16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.