Derek N. Jarvis v. Montgomery County, Maryland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2281
DEREK N. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; ISIAH LEGGETT; MONTGOMERY
COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; CONTRACTOR SECURITAS SECURITY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:11-cv-00654-AW)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner,
Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville,
Maryland; Hugh Scott Curtis, Roger L. Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Edward Victor
Arnold, James A. Rothschild, ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis seeks to appeal the district court’s
order granting and denying various motions filed in his civil
action. Although the order dismissed some defendants from the
action, Contractor Securitas Security remains a party to the
action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). The order Jarvis seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --