Michael L. Atwell v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.

11-2187Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 mar 2012

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2187
MICHAEL L. ATWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-01378-WMN)
Submitted: February 24, 2012 Decided: March 1, 2012
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael L. Atwell, Appellant Pro Se. Emmett F. McGee, Jr.,
Eileen Carr Riley, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael L. Atwell appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on his
employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
Atwell’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
the judgment of the district court. Atwell v. Am. Sugar
Refining, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01378-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.