Tornello Fontaine, pierce el-bey Grantor Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah Muur’s… v. City of Charlotte; Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; T. Bobrek; John Doe

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2125
TORNELLO FONTAINE, pierce el-bey Grantor Washitaw de
Dugdahmoundyah Muur’s Grantor/In Propria Persona,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE; CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT;
T. BOBREK; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00131-RJC-DCK)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Noble Tornello Fontaine Pierce El-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard Rustin Perlungher, CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE
DEPARTMENT, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tornello Fontaine appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss Fontaine’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Fontaine v. City of
Charlotte, No. 3:11-cv-00131-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2011).
Further, we deny Fontaine’s motion for sanctions and for a grand
jury trial and, accordingly, deny as moot Defendants-Appellees’
motion to strike Fontaine’s motion. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --