Percy Lee Clay; Diane Clay v. C Tcorporation System, d/b/a Citimortgage, Inc.; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

11-1962Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 feb 2012

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1962
PERCY LEE CLAY; DIANE CLAY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
C T CORPORATION SYSTEM, d/b/a Citimortgage, Inc.;
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00925-WO-PTS)
Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Percy Lee Clay, Diane Clay, Appellants Pro Se. Joseph Samuel
Dowdy, Pamela Wachter McAfee, Meghan E. B. Pridemore, NELSON
MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district
court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of
CitiMortgage, Inc., on their claims for breach of contract,
conversion, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Clay v. C T Corporation, No. 1:08-cv-00925-WO-PTS
(M.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2011). We deny the Clays’ motions to recuse
and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.