United States of America v. Ruhullah As-Sadiq; Dion Thomas

10-7664Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 feb 2011

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7664
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RUHULLAH AS-SADIQ; DION THOMAS,
Defendants – Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:00-cr-00176-F-1; 5:00-cr-00176-F-3)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ruhullah As-Sadiq, Dion Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Michael
Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jennifer P.
May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ruhullah As-Sadiq and Dion Thomas, federal prisoners,
appeal the district court’s order denying their joint motion
seeking the disclosure, post-trial, of statements made by a co-
defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. As-Sadiq, Nos. 5:00-cr-00176-
F-1; 5:00-cr-00176-F-3 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.