Kenneth Hinton v. James W. Rudasill, Jr.

10-6335Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 lug 2010

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6335
KENNETH HINTON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JAMES W. RUDASILL, JR.,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:08-cv-01460-AW)
Submitted: July 7, 2010 Decided: July 19, 2010
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. James W. Rudasill, Jr.,
Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Hinton appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s motion for summary dismissal of his
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Hinton v. Rudasill, No. 8:08-cv-
01460-AW (D. Md. filed Feb. 25, 2010; entered Feb. 26, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.