Liliana E. Pazmino v. Lasalle Bank N.a., as Trustee for Lehman XS Trust Mortgage Pass Through…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1739
LILIANA E. PAZMINO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LASALLE BANK N.A., as Trustee for Lehman XS Trust Mortgage
Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-19 c/o Bank of
America, N.A., a federally chartered bank, successor by
merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A.; LEHMAN XS TRUST 2006-19;
AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CTX MORTGAGE CORPORATION LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company; ALG TRUSTEE LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability
company; MATTHEW S. FOX, an individual as Trustee; JOAN E.
KATZ, an individual as Trustee; JOHN AND JANE DOES,
Certificate Holders I-M; QUI CHI DOE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:09-cv-01173-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: July 27, 2011 Decided: July 29, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher E. Brown, R. Michael Smith, BROWN, BROWN & BROWN,
P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Amy S. Owen, Ben
Selan, COCHRAN & OWEN, LLC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Liliana E. Pazmino appeals from the district court’s
final judgment entered after the district court granted
Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her
claims against Defendants, including her state law claim for
quiet title. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
See Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A., No. 1:09-cv-01173-GBL-JFA
(E.D. Va. filed June 30, 2010; entered July 1, 2010); see also
Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --