Richard Grant, Sr. v. Isec, Incorporated

10-1584Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30 set 2010

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1584
RICHARD GRANT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ISEC, INCORPORATED; DONALD FILINKS, Jointly and severally in
his official capacity as Foreman or Superintendant; MICHAEL
SAFECHUCK, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as
Foreman or Superintendant, GABE SHERMAN, Jointly and
severally in his official capacity as Foreman or
Superintendant, RICHARD SPRINGER, Jointly and severally in
his official capacity as Director of Human Resources,
MICHAEL HANNEKE, Jointly and severally in his official
capacity as Foreman or Superintendant; JAMES MCALLISTER,
Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Vice-
President of Eastern Operations; JEFFREY MORROW, Jointly and
severally in his official capacity as Installation Manager;
LOUIS DANIELS, Jointly and severally in his official
capacity as Foreman or Superintendant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-02791-RDB)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Richard Grant, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Hammock, Bruce
Stephen Harrison, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Richard Grant, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of ISEC, Inc. on his
employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. ISEC, Inc., No.
1:08-cv-02791-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.