Warren Katz v. HOLLAND AND KNIGHT, LLP.; THOMAS M. BROWNELL, Esq.; JOCELYN W. BRITTIN, Esq.

10-1119Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 lug 2010

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1119
WARREN KATZ,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HOLLAND AND KNIGHT, LLP.; THOMAS M. BROWNELL, Esq.; JOCELYN
W. BRITTIN, Esq.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-01106-TSE-IDD)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren Katz, Appellant Pro Se. John Thorpe Richards, Jr.,
Robert P. Trout, TROUT CACHERIS, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Warren Katz appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Katz v.
Holland & Knight, LLP, No. 1:09-cv-01106-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed
Jan. 8, 2010 & entered Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.