Clayton Williams v. STEVEN RYAN, Physical Therapist

09-6063Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16 set 2009

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6063
CLAYTON WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STEVEN RYAN, Physical Therapist; DWAIN M. BREWER, Officer,
CO II; RODERICK R. SOWER, CCE Warden,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:07-cv-03461-JFM)
Submitted: September 4, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clayton Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Clayton Williams appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Ryan,
No. 1:07-cv-03461-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 13, 2008). We also deny
Williams’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.