Keith A. Cousins v. MOVIE GALLERY, INC., formerly doing business as Game Crazy, formerly doing business…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2386
KEITH A. COUSINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MOVIE GALLERY, INC., formerly doing business as Game Crazy,
formerly doing business as M.G. Midwest, formerly doing
business as M.G.A., Inc., formerly doing business as
Moovies, Inc., formerly doing business as Movie Gallery
Asset Management, Inc., formerly doing business as Movie
Gallery Finance, Inc., formerly doing business as M.G.A.
Realty 1, Inc., formerly doing business as Movie Gallery
Licensing, Inc., formerly doing business as Movie Gallery
Promotions, Inc., formerly doing business as Movie Gallery
Services, Inc., formerly doing business as Movie Gallery US,
Inc., formerly doing business as MovieGallery.com, Inc.,
formerly doing business as Video Library, Inc., formerly
doing business as Video Update, Inc.; HOLLYWOOD
ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION; M.G. DIGITAL, LLC; M.G.A. REALTY
I, LLC; MG AUTOMATION LLC; MOVIE GALLERY US, LLC,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Douglas O. Tice, Jr., Chief
Bankruptcy Judge. (07-33849)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 13, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Romaine S. Scott, III, HASKELL SLAUGHTER YOUNG & REDIKER, LLC,
Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellant. Michael A. Condyles,
Peter J. Barrett, Jeremy S. Williams, KUTAK ROCK LLP, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Keith A. Cousins appeals from the bankruptcy court’s
orders holding him in contempt for filing a lawsuit in violation
of the releases contained within the Order of Confirmation of
the Appellees’ Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan, and denying
reconsideration of that order.*
AFFIRMED
Our review of the record and the
briefs filed by the parties discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the bankruptcy
court. Cousins v. Movie Gallery, Inc., No. 07-33849 (Bankr.
E.D. Va. Sept. 25 & Nov. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
* We previously granted the parties’ petition for permission
to appeal directly to this court from the bankruptcy court. See
Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(f)(2)(B).

-- 3 of 3 --