Gloria Bautista v. Clemson University

09-1396Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 apr 2010

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1396
GLORIA BAUTISTA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(8:07-cv-01287-HFF)
Submitted: March 24, 2010 Decided: April 1, 2010
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin Hutson, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant.
James W. Logan, Jr., LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gloria Bautista appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s reports and recommendations to
grant Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her race and
national origin discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Bautista v. Clemson Univ., No. 8:07-cv-01287-HFF
(D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.