George Paul Laroque v. Sara A. Conti

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1174
GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SARA A. CONTI,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,
Party-in-Interest,
ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,
Debtor.
No. 09-1175
GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SARA A. CONTI,
Defendant – Appellee,
and

-- 1 of 5 --

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,
Party-in-Interest,
ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,
Debtor.
No. 09-1176
GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SARA A. CONTI,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,
Party-in-Interest,
ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,
Debtor.
No. 09-1177
GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SARA A. CONTI,
Defendant – Appellee,
2

-- 2 of 5 --

and
MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,
Party-in-Interest,
ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,
Debtor.
No. 09-1186
GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SARA A. CONTI,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,
Party-in-Interest,
ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,
Debtor.
No. 09-1263
GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
3

-- 3 of 5 --

SARA A. CONTI,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,
Party-in-Interest,
ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,
Debtor.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569-
NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT;
1:09-cv-00078-NCT)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se. Sara A. Conti, Appellee
Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
4

-- 4 of 5 --

5
PER CURIAM:
George Paul LaRoque appeals the district court’s
orders dismissing his appeals from the bankruptcy court and
denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. LaRoque v. Conti,
Nos. 1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569-NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT;
1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-00078-NCT (M.D.N.C.
Jan. 30, 2009 & Feb. 13, 2009). We grant LaRoque’s motions to
consolidate his appeals and deny his motions for transcripts and
a certified copy of the record at government expense. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 5 of 5 --