David Bach v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

08-2299Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 mar 2009

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2299
DAVID BACH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
(Tax Ct. No. 06-23061-L)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 19, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Bach, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Clark, Kenneth W.
Rosenberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C.; Nathan J. Hochman, Assistant Attorney General, Washington,
D.C.; Donald L. Korb, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Bach appeals from the tax court’s orders
upholding the Commissioner’s deficiency determination and
proposed collection activities with respect to his tax liability
for the 1993 tax year, and denying his motions for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the tax court. See Bach v. Comm’r, IRS, Tax Ct. No. 06-
23061-L (U.S.T.C. Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 10, 2008 & entered
Sept. 11, 2008; filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered Sept. 22, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.