Kouroush Cyrus Sany; Security System Solutions, Incorporated v. Science Applications International Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2101
KOUROUSH CYRUS SANY; SECURITY SYSTEM SOLUTIONS,
INCORPORATED,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:08-cv-00653-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: May 1, 2009 Decided: May 18, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin M. Mooradian, Annandale, Virginia; Carlos M. Sandoval,
SANDOVAL & KENG, PLLC, Waldorf, Maryland; Robert Norman Levin,
THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT N. LEVIN, PC, Rockville, Maryland, for
Appellants. Joseph M. Potenza, Bradley C. Wright, BANNER &
WITCOFF, LTD., Washington, D.C.; Christopher J. Renk, Michael
Harris, BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD., Chicago, Illinois; Robert R.
Sparks, Jr., SPARKS & CRAIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order
compelling arbitration and staying the proceedings as to
Appellant Kouroush Cyrus Sany. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Appellants seek to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --