077001.U

07-7001Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 ott 2007

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7001
HARVEY P. SHORT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE; PRESSIE BOYKIN, Probation Agent;
AUDREY E. MELBOURNE; WHITE, Assistant State
Attorney; JAY CREECH, Assistant State's
Attorney; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; WARDEN
SMITH; RICHARD A. LANHAM, JR.; SECRETARY OF
PUBLIC SAFETY, and Correctional Services;
WILLIAM D. MISSOURI; WILLIAM H. MCCULLOUGH;
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.; PRINCE GEORGE'S
COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE, State
Trooper #1; JOHN DOE, State Trooper #2;
WILLIAM DONALD SHAFFER, Governor; PARRIS N.
GLENDENING, Governor; BISHOP L. ROBINSON; JANE
DOE, Commitment Office Manager; US AIR GROUP,
INCORPORATED; SHERIFF PENDERGRASS; CAPTAIN
HARVEY; PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Superintendent;
MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL TRAINING CENTER, Warden;
MARYLAND RECEPTION, DIAGNOSTIC AND
CLASSIFICATION INSTITUTE; SUPER FRESH FOOD
MARKETS OF MARYLAND, INCORPORATED; 7-ELEVEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:06-cv-02217-DKC)
Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 25, 2007

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Short v. Doe,
No. 8:06-cv-02217-DKC (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.