Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6246
In Re: MICHAEL ALLEN KOKOSKI,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:02-cv-01254)
Submitted: June 6, 2007 Decided: June 19, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Allen Kokoski, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael Allen Kokoski petitions for a writ of mandamus
seeking an order compelling the district court to act on post-
judgment motions. We deny the petition.
The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy
burden of showing that he has “no other adequate means to attain
the relief he desires” and that his right to such relief is “clear
and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S.
33, 35 (1980) (citations omitted); In re: First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988); In re: Beard, 811 F.2d
818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987) (citing Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394 (1976)).
Because the district court disposed of every motion
Kokoski filed, there is nothing for this court to do. Accordingly,
we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
