Roman Tiffer v. Worker=scompensation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1852
ROMAN TIFFER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WORKER=S COMPENSATION; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION;
ABACUS CORPORATION; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:08-
cv-01417-JFM)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 24, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roman Tiffer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roman Tiffer appeals the district court=s order dismissing
without prejudice his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '
1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). In his informal appellate brief, Tiffer does
not address the district court=s ruling that he failed to allege
facts setting forth a claim cognizable in federal court.*
Therefore, Tiffer has waived appellate review of that issue. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b) (AThe Court will limit its review to the issues
raised in the informal brief.@). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court=s order. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal because the
order of dismissal suggests that no amendment to the complaint
could cure the defects in Tiffer=s case. See Domino Sugar Corp. v.
Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993).

-- 2 of 2 --