Sydney Cheryl Sutton v. North Carolina Department of Labor

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1380
SYDNEY CHERYL SUTTON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:06-cv-00308-FL)
Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: November 4, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles E. Monteith, Jr., Shelli H. Rice, MONTEITH & RICE, PLLC,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney
General for North Carolina, Victoria L. Voight, Special Deputy
Attorney General, Sonya Calloway-Durham, Assistant Attorney
General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sydney Cheryl Sutton appeals the district court’s
order granting Defendant summary judgment on her retaliation
claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the
North Carolina Whistleblower Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 126-85
(2005). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Sutton v. North Carolina Dep’t of Labor,
No. 5:06-cv-00308-FL (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 28, 2008; entered
March 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --