James Edward Miller v. Mike Pierce

06-7209Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 giu 2007

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7209
JAMES EDWARD MILLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MIKE PIERCE; DAVID PENDRY; BUTCH HOLLAND; TIM
CHEEK; RONNIE PRICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:99-cv-00050)
Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: June 15, 2007
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Mason Thomas,
PATRICK, HARPER & DIXON, Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Miller appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint upon remand
from this court. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Miller v. Pierce, No. 5:99-cv-00050 (W.D.N.C.
June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.