United States of America v. RAY WALLACE METTETAL, JR., a/k/a Steven Ray Maupin

06-6963Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 mar 2007

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6963
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAY WALLACE METTETAL, JR., a/k/a Steven Ray
Maupin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (3:96-cr-50034-nkm)
Submitted: February 14, 2007 Decided: March 1, 2007
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Crim P. 41(g) motion for return of
property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we grant Mettetal’s motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Mettetal, No. 3:96-
cr-50034-nkm (W.D. Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.