Brenda D. Lewis, M.a.s., J.d v. Microsoft Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1354
BRENDA D. LEWIS, M.A.S., J.D.; WILLIAM L.
FLOWERS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00343-H)
Submitted: March 9, 2007 Decided: March 29, 2007
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda D. Lewis, William L. Flowers, Appellants Pro Se. Richard L.
Farley, Christopher Allen Hicks, KATTEN, MUCHIN & ROSENMAN, LLP,
Charlotte, North Carolina; Timothy L. Boller, William O. Ferron,
Jr., SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, PLLC, Seattle,
Washington, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Brenda D. Lewis, M.A.S., J.D., and William L. Flowers,
Jr., appeal the district court’s order granting Microsoft
Corporation’s motions for summary judgment and to dismiss, and
denying relief in their civil action in which they alleged various
claims concerning trademark infringement. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. Microsoft
Corp., No. 5:05-cv-00343-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --