Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7596
JIMMIE HUGENE WOODSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALEXANDER LAURY, Richmond P.D.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-05-496-2)
Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmie H. Woodson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jimmie Hugene Woodson appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Woodson v. Laury, Nos. CA-05-
496-2; CA-05-496 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 29 & entered Sept. 30 & Oct.
25, 2005). We deny Woodson’s motion for production of documents.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
