Robert John Moes v. STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden

05-7429Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 feb 2006

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7429
ROBERT JOHN MOES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden; DAVID A. HOLLER, Case
Manager,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-04-
2959-8-RWT)
Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 2, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert John Moes, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Frederick, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert John Moes, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the
district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and have found
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Moes v. DeWalt, No. CA-04-2959-8-RWT
(D. Md. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 30, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.