Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6334
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GLEN MARK, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-89-263-G; CA-04-500-1)
Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: September 1, 2005
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glen Mark, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*Mark’s motion for expedited treatment is denied as moot.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Glen Mark, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). Our review of the district court’s
opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation discloses no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as unnecessary Mark’s
motion for a certificate of appealability, grant his motion to
proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. * See United States v. Mark, Nos. CR-89-263-G; CA-
04-500-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
