Betty Gist v. the Duracell Incorporated Managed Disability Plan

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1865
BETTY GIST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE DURACELL INCORPORATED MANAGED DISABILITY
PLAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columba. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-882-0-JFA)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Betty Gist, Appellant Pro Se. Bernie Wellington Ellis, MCNAIR LAW
FIRM, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Betty Gist appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her action seeking long term disability benefits under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Gist v. Duracell Inc. Managed
Disability Plan, No. CA-04-882-0-JFA (D.S.C. filed July 7, 2005 &
entered July 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --