Mahesh C. Sikka v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, Department of Defense

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1121
MAHESH C. SIKKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, Department of
Defense; U. S. DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-03-895-3)
Submitted: May 18, 2005 Decided: June 8, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mahesh C. Sikka, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mahesh C. Sikka appeals the district court’s order
adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment for Defendants on Sikka’s Title VII
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Sikka v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-895-3 (E.D. Va.
Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --