Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7222
LOUIS LAVELLE FLETCHER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STEVE DEWALT,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-02-910-5-H)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 3, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis Lavelle Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Louis Lavelle Fletcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Fletcher v. DeWalt, No. CA-02-910-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 2004). In
addition, we find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in
its denial of Fletcher’s Rule 59(e) motion. Tempkin v. Frederick
County Comm’rs, 945 F.2d 716, 724 (4th Cir. 1991). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
