Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X v. Maryland Division of Correction

04-6982Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 ott 2004

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6982
MALCOLM MAXWELL RYIDU-X,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; WILLIAM W.
SONDERVAN, Commission of Corrections; THOMAS
R. CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland Correctional
Adjustment Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-02-692-WDQ)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 20, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane
Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Ryidu-X v. Maryland Div. of Corr., No. CA-02-692-WDQ
(D. Md. filed May 13, 2004 & entered May 14, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.