James O. Hodgkin, Iv v. G. K. WASHINGTON, Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6462
JAMES O. HODGKIN, IV,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
G. K. WASHINGTON, Warden, Buckingham
Correctional Center,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (CA-03-590-7-SGW)
Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James O. Hodgkin, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James O. Hodgkin appeals from the dismissal of his 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition by the district court as untimely
filed. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas
corpus proceeding unless a circuit judge or justice issues a
certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(2000). This
court will not issue a certificate of appealability as to claims
dismissed by a district court on procedural grounds unless the
movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find
it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the
denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason
would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in
its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.
2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
We have reviewed the record and determine that Hodgkin
has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537
U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid in the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --